Editor’s note: If you would like to submit a letter for possible publication, please email it to email@example.com. See our Publishing Guidelines.
I would like to pose some questions about the rationale of state funerals.
How, and by whom, are decisions made about offers of state funerals? Are there defined selection criteria for such offers?
Should there be an opportunity for community consultation? The cost must be significant. Taxpayers deserve to have some input about whether the expenditure could be better directed elsewhere – perhaps to help victims of natural disasters, even in another state.
Consider the case of a hypothetical person who displayed a level of sporting prowess but had admitted to cheating on his/her spouse and using illicit substances. Would such a person be a suitable recipient for a state funeral?
The Big Bang or a miracle?
Currently, there are two dominant explanations for the existence of the cosmos: traditionally variations of the creative being idea and, more recently, variations of the Big Bang theory.
The former supposes either that the creative being either existed always or created itself; the latter that the Big Bang either occurred in a void or was born out of existing energy. In either case, something had to be created out of nothing – which our scientific understanding says is both impossible and illogical – as an effect must be preceded by a cause.
In other words both theism and atheism are illogical, leaving agnosticism.
But as we know that we and the cosmos do exist, then a miracle, something that defies known laws of physics, has happened.
In which case it seems that it is equally logical to believe in a creative being or the Big Bang or to be an agnostic.
Photo by panyawat auitpol on Unsplash.