{"id":15959,"date":"2025-12-05T13:38:28","date_gmt":"2025-12-05T02:38:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/rationalemagazine.com\/?p=15959"},"modified":"2025-12-05T13:38:53","modified_gmt":"2025-12-05T02:38:53","slug":"flat-earth-spirits-and-conspiracy-theories-how-experience-shapes-extraordinary-beliefs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rationalemagazine.com\/index.php\/2025\/12\/05\/flat-earth-spirits-and-conspiracy-theories-how-experience-shapes-extraordinary-beliefs\/","title":{"rendered":"Flat Earth, spirits and conspiracy theories: How experience shapes extraordinary beliefs"},"content":{"rendered":"

On 22 February 2020, ‘Mad’ Mike Hughes<\/a> towed a homemade rocket to the Mojave Desert and launched himself into the sky. His goal? To view the flatness of the Earth from space. This was his third attempt, and tragically it was fatal. Hughes crashed shortly after takeoff and died.<\/p>\n

Hughes\u2019 nickname \u2013 Mad Mike \u2013 might strike you as apt. Is it not crazy to risk your life fighting for a theory that was disproven in ancient Greece<\/a>?<\/p>\n

But Hughes\u2019 conviction, though striking, is not unique. Across all recorded cultures<\/a>, people have held strong beliefs that seemed to lack evidence in their favour \u2013 one might refer to them as \u201cextraordinary beliefs.\u201d<\/p>\n

For evolutionary anthropologists<\/a> like me, the ubiquity of these kinds of beliefs is a puzzle. Human brains evolved to form accurate models of the world<\/a>. Most of the time, we do a pretty good job. So why do people also often adopt and develop beliefs that lack strong supporting evidence?<\/p>\n

In a new review in the journal Trends in Cognitive Sciences<\/em>, I propose a simple answer<\/a>. People come to believe in flat Earth, spirits and microchipped vaccines for the same reasons they come to believe in anything else. Their experiences lead them to think those beliefs are true.<\/p>\n

Most social scientists have taken a different view on this subject. Supernatural beliefs<\/a>, conspiracy theories<\/a> and pseudoscience<\/a> have struck researchers as totally impervious to contrary evidence. Consequently, they have assumed that experience is not relevant to the formation of those beliefs. Instead, they\u2019ve focused on two other explanatory factors.<\/p>\n

The first common explanation is cognitive biases. Many psychologists argue that humans possess mental shortcuts for reasoning about how the world works. For instance, people are quite prone to seeing intentions and intelligence<\/a> behind random events. A bias of this kind might explain why people often believe that deities control phenomena such as weather or illness.<\/p>\n

The second factor is social dynamics<\/a>. People adopt certain beliefs not because they\u2019re sure that they\u2019re true but because other people hold those beliefs, or they want to signal something about themselves to others. For example, some conspiracy theorists may adopt strange beliefs because those beliefs come with a community<\/a> of loyal and supportive co-believers.<\/p>\n

Both of these approaches can partly explain how people come to hold extraordinary beliefs. But they discount three ways that experience, in tandem with the other two factors, can shape extraordinary beliefs.<\/p>\n

1. Experience as a filter<\/h2>\n

First, I propose that experience can act as a filter. It determines which extraordinary beliefs can successfully spread throughout a population.<\/p>\n

Take the flat Earth theory as an example. We know with absolute certainty that it\u2019s false, but it\u2019s no more or less wrong than a theory that the Earth is shaped like a cone. So what makes flat Earth so much more successful than this equally incorrect alternative?<\/p>\n

The answer is as obvious as it seems \u2013 the Earth looks flat when you\u2019re standing on it, not cone-shaped. Visual evidence favors one extraordinary belief over the others. Of course, scientific evidence clearly shows that the Earth is round; but it\u2019s not surprising that some people prefer to trust what their eyes are telling them.<\/p>\n

2. Experience as a spark<\/h2>\n

My second argument is that experience acts as a spark for extraordinary beliefs. Strange experiences, such as auditory hallucinations, are difficult to explain and understand. So people do their best to explain them \u2013 and, in doing so, they come up with beliefs that seem fittingly strange.<\/p>\n

For this pathway, sleep paralysis is a good case study<\/a>. Sleep paralysis<\/a> happens in the space between sleeping and waking \u2013 you feel like you\u2019re awake, but you can\u2019t move or speak. It\u2019s terrifying and quite common<\/a>. And, interestingly, sufferers usually feel like there\u2019s a threatening agent<\/a> sitting on their chest.<\/p>\n

As a scientist, I interpret sleep paralysis as the result of neural confusion. But it\u2019s not difficult to picture how someone without a scientific background \u2013 that is, nearly every human being in history \u2013 might interpret the experience as evidence of supernatural beings<\/a>.<\/p>\n

3. Experience as a tool<\/h2>\n

To me, the third potential route to extraordinary beliefs is especially intriguing. In many cases, people don\u2019t just develop extraordinary beliefs; they develop immersive practices that make those beliefs feel true.<\/p>\n

For instance, imagine that you\u2019re a farmer living in the highlands of Lesotho in southern Africa, where I conduct ethnographic fieldwork. You suffer a series of miscarriages, and you want to know why. So you go to a traditional healer \u2013 she tells you that you can learn the answer from your ancestors by drinking a hallucinogenic brew<\/a>. You drink the brew. Soon after, you begin to see spirits; they speak to you and explain your misfortune.<\/p>\n

Clearly, an experience like this one might reinforce your belief in the existence of spirits. Such immersive practices \u2013 such as prayer<\/a>, ritualistic dance<\/a> and the religious use of psychoactive substances<\/a> \u2013 create evidence that makes the associated beliefs feel true.<\/p>\n

Extraordinary beliefs are not inherently good or bad. In particular, religious beliefs provide meaning, security and a sense of community for billions of people.<\/p>\n

But some extraordinary beliefs are sources of serious concern. Misinformation about science<\/a> and politics<\/a> is rampant and immensely dangerous. By recognising how those beliefs are shaped by experience, researchers can find better ways to combat their spread<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Just as importantly, though, my suggested perspective might encourage more compassion and kinship toward people who hold beliefs that seem very different from yours. They are not ‘mad’ or insincere. Like any other human being, they think the evidence is on their side.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

This article was originally published on <\/em>The Conversation.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Image by Daniel Olah<\/a> on Unsplash.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

On 22 February 2020, ‘Mad’ Mike Hughes towed a homemade rocket to the Mojave Desert and launched himself into the<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":849,"featured_media":15960,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[63],"tags":[321,546,365],"coauthors":[816],"class_list":["post-15959","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-philosophy","tag-conspiracy-theories","tag-critical-thinking","tag-misinformation"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rationalemagazine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15959","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rationalemagazine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rationalemagazine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rationalemagazine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/849"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rationalemagazine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15959"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/rationalemagazine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15959\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15964,"href":"https:\/\/rationalemagazine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15959\/revisions\/15964"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rationalemagazine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/15960"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rationalemagazine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15959"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rationalemagazine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15959"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rationalemagazine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15959"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rationalemagazine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=15959"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}