{"id":14009,"date":"2024-01-17T12:42:05","date_gmt":"2024-01-17T01:42:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/rationalemagazine.com\/?p=14009"},"modified":"2024-01-31T20:14:14","modified_gmt":"2024-01-31T09:14:14","slug":"paul-kingsnorths-new-religiousness","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rationalemagazine.com\/index.php\/2024\/01\/17\/paul-kingsnorths-new-religiousness\/","title":{"rendered":"Paul Kingsnorth\u2019s new religiousness"},"content":{"rendered":"

On Christmas Day, an essay appeared in the online magazine <\/span>UnHerd<\/span><\/i> under the title <\/span>\u2018Our Godless era is dead: A second religiousness is sweeping the West\u2019<\/span><\/a>. The author was Paul Kingsnorth, an interesting individual whose personal journey has been colourful. He relates that he has converted to the Romanian Eastern Orthodox Church and that he believes a \u201cnew religiousness is sweeping the West\u201d. I felt sufficiently provoked by his remarks to pen this response.<\/span><\/p>\n

After a lively decade-and-a-half as a journalist, Kingsnorth gave up journalism in 2009 to co-found something called the Dark Mountain Project, which describes itself as \u201ca network of writers, artists, and thinkers who have stopped believing the stories our civilisation tells itself.\u201d They decided, it seems, to make up a story of their own.<\/span><\/p>\n

Now, people make up stories all the time. The best of them are lasting and luminous. Many of them are pulp fiction or<\/span>\u00a0altogether incoherent and unpublishable. Kingsnorth\u2019s is on the grand scale.<\/span><\/p>\n

Looking back from his Dark Mountain, he reflects that he grew up amid:<\/span><\/p>\n

“\u2026the fading Christian heritage of England, the liberalism which had replaced it, an Enlightenment-era faith in science, reason and \u201cprogress\u201d, and the much newer afterglow of the Sixties sexual revolution.”<\/span><\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

As you will intuit, he became disillusioned with all this. He thinks everything has been going dismally downhill since the Enlightenment and that only religion \u2013 of a very particular kind \u2013 will save us.<\/span><\/p>\n

He now believes: that Oswald Spengler and other prophets of doom were correct in diagnosing the \u201cdecline of the West\u201d; that Nietzsche was wrong about \u201cthe death of God\u201d; that \u2018God\u2019 came down to Earth in the form of Jesus and \u201cwe should assume that he knew what he was doing\u201d; that we all need to pray and withdraw from the world if we wish to transform it; and that we need a regular cycle of Christian feast days and fasts to make our lives as meaningful as \u2013 he now believes \u2013 they once were.<\/span><\/p>\n

To his credit, he cautions against militant or organised religion. As he explains, his is a faith of the \u201cDesert Fathers\u201d kind, though it seems he prefers the green coastlands of western Ireland to the arid landscapes of the Egyptian Sahara and a comfortable, computer-equipped and insulated cottage to the pillar of Simeon Stylites, or other eremites.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

He specifically rejects militant religion, whether crusading Christianity or jihadist Islam. That\u2019s a relief. He spurns Ayaan Hirsi Ali\u2019s call for Christianity-inspired \u201ccivilisational war\u201d. That, too, is a relief.<\/span><\/p>\n

Like many a mystic before him \u2013 especially one who could find an audience for his preaching \u2013 he bemoans the customs and social decadence of his time (as he sees them). And, to short circuit all manner of retorts, he declares:<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cThe biggest lie my culture told me was \u2026 that humans could reason their way to freedom.\u201d\u00a0<\/span><\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Take a moment to absorb the implications of that. It\u2019s hardly an original assertion, but it is profoundly pernicious \u2013 and irrational.<\/span><\/p>\n

Kingsnorth, we might casually comment, is cordially welcome to his not-so-ascetic Irish cottage and his Romanian rituals, his prayers to \u2018God\u2019 and his idiosyncratic faith on his Dark Mountain. But he is certainly not welcome to stand by his notion that the claims of reason and freedom being linked are \u201cthe biggest lie my culture told me\u201d. There we cross swords.<\/span><\/p>\n

To begin with, he makes this statement in the middle of an essay which is supposed to persuade us that he has reached his new faith for good reasons. Why else would he write such an essay, setting out his case?\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

If he were only communing with the true believers, he would, surely, just announce how great \u2018God\u2019 is and how beautiful His ways. He might quote Psalms and evoke passages from Isaiah or the Gospels or the Book of Revelation. But he would not reason with his readers. For him to do so surely means he is participating in what he has described as a great lie.<\/span><\/p>\n

The oldest insight in the philosophical canon is that if the claims of religion cannot withstand the critical scrutiny of reason, they are without secure foundation. That doesn\u2019t alter the observable and much-studied reality that countless human beings, in all cultures, have harboured religious beliefs of many kinds and participated in religious practices.<\/span><\/p>\n

Rational tolerance has been based, in both the classical and the modern worlds, on the simple maxim that human religious beliefs, being diverse, mutually incompatible and stubbornly held, cannot be suppressed, but must be constrained under civil law.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

If, as Kingsnorth asserts, a \u201cnew religiousness\u201d were sweeping the West, we must require of him and those who share his opinion that they produce the compelling evidence for this or admit that the claim is one based on wishful thinking and faith rather than reason. If, conversely, he were to come forward with compelling evidence, we would have to respond that he appears to have both empirical evidence and reason behind his claim. Yet that ought to disconcert him, given his denunciation of the role of reason in setting us free.<\/span><\/p>\n

Let us suppose, however, that there was unimpeachable empirical evidence that a new religious fervour was sweeping the West and that it was inspired by disillusionment with science and reason. Would that be grounds for joining the new believers in their faith? If so, what particular version of it and to what end?\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Reason, one suggests, would again have to be used. But then we\u2019d be right back where Kingsnorth insists we shouldn\u2019t go.<\/span><\/p>\n

Is there any common ground with him? Perhaps in this: he says that only a rarefied, quietist Christian faith is any good and that it should seek to transform the world by withdrawing from it. A good rationalist might say: Why not simply embrace critical reason, avoid excess, enjoy science and one\u2019s cottage, and seek to do rational good in a world always in need of sane counsel?<\/span><\/p>\n

If you wish to republish this original article, please attribute to\u00a0<\/i><\/b>Rationale<\/i><\/b><\/a>.\u00a0<\/i><\/b>Click here<\/i><\/b><\/a>\u00a0to find out more about republishing under Creative Commons.<\/i><\/b><\/p>\n

Image: Screengrab from ‘Seen & Unseen’ (YouTube); Screengrab from UnHerd.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

On Christmas Day, an essay appeared in the online magazine UnHerd under the title \u2018Our Godless era is dead: A<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":14012,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16],"tags":[352,418],"coauthors":[151],"class_list":["post-14009","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ethics-religion","tag-christianity","tag-religious-affiliation"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rationalemagazine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14009","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rationalemagazine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rationalemagazine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rationalemagazine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rationalemagazine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14009"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/rationalemagazine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14009\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14051,"href":"https:\/\/rationalemagazine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14009\/revisions\/14051"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rationalemagazine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/14012"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rationalemagazine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14009"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rationalemagazine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14009"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rationalemagazine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14009"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rationalemagazine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=14009"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}