{"id":11549,"date":"2022-04-14T16:18:52","date_gmt":"2022-04-14T06:18:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/rationalemagazine.com\/?p=11549"},"modified":"2022-07-15T22:35:32","modified_gmt":"2022-07-15T12:35:32","slug":"political-advertising-in-australia-few-restrictions-no-spending-limit-and-almost-no-oversight","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rationalemagazine.com\/index.php\/2022\/04\/14\/political-advertising-in-australia-few-restrictions-no-spending-limit-and-almost-no-oversight\/","title":{"rendered":"Political advertising in Australia: Few restrictions, no spending limit, and almost no oversight"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">So the federal election is on. Billboards are suddenly plastered with party slogans, campaign ads are all around us, and our social media feeds are flaring up with political spin.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Political advertising is a major feature of Australian election campaigns. But sometimes it can be difficult to separate facts from scare campaigns, or even to distinguish a government ad from a party ad.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">So what are the rules that govern political advertising in the upcoming election campaign?<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>There are very few restrictions on political advertising<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Political advertising seeks to promote a political party, candidate, or political agenda. These ads can come from political parties themselves, or from anyone else who wants to influence voters and can afford to pay for one.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">We have already seen several major advertising campaigns launched for this election, including the Coalition\u2019s \u2018<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/ScottMorrisonMP\/status\/1512675612796006404\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Why I love Australia<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2019, Labor\u2019s \u2018<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/AlboMP\/status\/1504336732367425539\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A better future<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2019, and a series of prominent United Australia Party <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=dMnD_jaOkQo&amp;ab_channel=UnitedAustraliaParty\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">ads<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">There are no limits on how much political parties, independent candidates, or third parties can spend in a federal election. So the <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.smh.com.au\/politics\/federal\/clive-palmer-spends-100-times-more-than-major-parties-on-advertising-20220218-p59xq4.html\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">race is on<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> to raise more money than your opponents so that you can spread your message further and wider.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Some funding also comes from the taxpayer to help cover campaign expenses, such as advertising. The Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) reimburses parties or candidates for some of their spending according to the <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.aec.gov.au\/parties_and_representatives\/public_funding\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">share of the primary vote they achieve<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> in the election. In the last federal election this amounted to <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.aec.gov.au\/Parties_and_Representatives\/financial_disclosure\/files\/reports\/funding-disclosure-2019.pdf\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A$70 million in funding<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Political ads need only meet some <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.aec.gov.au\/about_aec\/Publications\/Backgrounders\/authorisation.htm#electoralMatter\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">basic requirements<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, which are monitored by the AEC and the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA).<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">These include identifying who authorised the ad \u2013 that\u2019s the bit at the end of a TV or radio ad that sounds like someone trying to break a fast-talking record \u2013 and not misleading voters on <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">how<\/span><\/i> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.aec.gov.au\/about_aec\/Publications\/Backgrounders\/authorisation.htm\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">to cast a vote<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">If an ad encourages voters to fill out their voting paper incorrectly, the AEC can intervene, but only to correct that specific part of the ad. ACMA also enforces a \u2018blackout period\u2019 on TV and radio ads in the final few days before election day.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Truth is not a requirement<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">When it comes to the content of political ads, there is almost no oversight. <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Political ads are not fact-checked. The truth or otherwise of what is said in a political ad is left up to the <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.aec.gov.au\/About_AEC\/electoral-communication.htm\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">voter to determine for themselves<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It\u2019s worth noting this hands-off approach is very different to strict rules around commercial advertising. Where a company is alleged to have misled consumers about a product or service, the matter is investigated, the ad may be pulled, and the company could face fines or further penalties. But there are no consequences for political parties if they lie to voters in their ads.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">That means bad-faith characterisations of other parties\u2019 policies \u2013 or even flatly inaccurate ones \u2013 are perfectly OK under the law.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">That\u2019s how misleading scare campaigns have been allowed to feature so prominently in recent elections.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">During the 2019 election campaign, the Coalition hit Labor with false advertising about \u2018<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/australia-news\/2019\/jun\/08\/it-felt-like-a-big-tide-how-the-death-tax-lie-infected-australias-election-campaign\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">death taxes<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2019. And Labor ran the false \u2018Mediscare\u2019 <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.smh.com.au\/politics\/federal\/no-more-mediscares-australians-want-political-truth-in-advertising-laws-20160708-gq1iu2.html\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">campaign<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> against the Coalition at the 2016 election. Neither of these campaigns broke any rules.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Democratic politics, and election campaigns in particular, are naturally a contest of ideas. They involve values, promises, \u2018blue sky\u2019 thinking, and unproveable claims.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">But deliberately false and misleading advertising hurts the democratic process. It can divert voter attention from the real issues and potentially distort election outcomes.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In an attempt to tackle this problem, both South Australia and the ACT have enacted truth in political advertising laws at the state level. At the federal level, however, it\u2019s a case of anything goes.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>What about government advertising?<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Government advertising is different \u2013 or it\u2019s supposed to be. It\u2019s advertising funded by the taxpayer for the legitimate purpose of enabling the government of the day to communicate important information to the public.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Government advertising includes, for example, public campaigns to remind people to get their booster shots, or information on how to access assistance in a domestic violence situation.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">But sometimes government advertising can shade into political advertising, particularly when governments make ads spruiking their own performance.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Government advertising often ramps up in the pre-election period. We\u2019ve seen some examples of this recently, in the recent blue-shaded advertisements about \u2018<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/SHamiltonian\/status\/1510119877536669700\/photo\/1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Australia\u2019s Economic Plan<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2019, or \u2018<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/reneweconomy.com.au\/morrison-boosts-making-positive-energy-pre-election-ad-splurge-to-almost-31-million\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Making Positive Energy<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u2019. It\u2019s not clear what public benefit is served by ads like these.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Government advertising is subject to <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.finance.gov.au\/sites\/default\/files\/2019-11\/campaign-advertising-guidelines.pdf\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">guidelines<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> that require campaigns to be justified, objective, and fair, and prohibit the promotion of political party interests. But these guidelines are not enforceable.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.finance.gov.au\/publications\/compliance-advice\/compliance-advice-independent-communications-committee-government-advertising-campaigns\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Independent Communications Committee<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> reviews all campaigns costing more than $250,000, but it only sees them at the proposal stage, and can only provide advice to government. <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It has no power to veto a proposed ad campaign.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>What can we expect during the election period?<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">We probably won\u2019t be seeing much government advertising over the coming weeks. <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The government is now in \u2018caretaker\u2019 mode. <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.pmc.gov.au\/resource-centre\/government\/guidance-caretaker-conventions\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Caretaker conventions<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> state the Department of Finance and the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet must review all taxpayer-funded advertising and make recommendations on whether the campaigns should proceed or be deferred.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">If a campaign gets the green light, the government still has to get the Opposition\u2019s approval. As a result, any government advertising that looks suspiciously like government self-promotion tends to disappear during elections.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">But when it comes to political advertising, the sky is the limit \u2013 at least while parties\u2019 campaign funds hold out.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">We can expect political ads to continue to ramp up over the coming weeks. The onus will be on each voter to sift through the spin for the facts and for the policies that matter to them.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><em><strong>This article was co-authored by Kate Griffiths, Deputy Program Director, Grattan Institute.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p><b><i>This article was originally published in <\/i><\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/few-restrictions-no-spending-limit-and-almost-no-oversight-welcome-to-political-advertising-in-australia-181248\"><b>The Conversation<\/b><\/a><b><i>. It is republished under Creative Commons.<\/i><\/b><\/p>\n<p><b><i>Photo by <\/i><\/b><a href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/mikecogh\/43262781250\/in\/photolist-28UZ4By-pdGjHj-pdGjRA-fFxJ1o-pm1b6Y-SxKctc-pAsz8E-fFgqFF-qLcHJ8-wSF8f7-pkZgw8-fFxZCm-pCtc9w-fFgF7e-fFxPy3-fFxPhu-fFg8ZT-fFxRVG-fFgx2B-fFxZQy-nVPGLg-nw7Aem-nQozeP-6Umy7c-2m6W5Gq-fFxRvq-fFgy7v-fFgp1R-fFybmb-fFyoQN-fFyhCf-fFggK6-fFgH3g-fFyixW-fFy7Vd-fFguSX-fFy6QS-fFgst2-fFy4hW-fFydxu-fFycfS-fFybNU-fFxVcA-fFxU2q-fFygEW-fFydTC-fFgK8i-fFykmG-fFyjD1-fFgwkx\"><b><i>Michael Coghlan<\/i><\/b><\/a><b><i> on Flickr (CC).<\/i><\/b><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>So the federal election is on. Billboards are suddenly plastered with party slogans, campaign ads are all around us, and<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":522,"featured_media":11551,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[18],"tags":[342,341],"coauthors":[269],"class_list":["post-11549","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-law-politics","tag-australian-democracy","tag-political-advertising"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rationalemagazine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11549","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rationalemagazine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rationalemagazine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rationalemagazine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/522"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rationalemagazine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11549"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/rationalemagazine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11549\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11556,"href":"https:\/\/rationalemagazine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11549\/revisions\/11556"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rationalemagazine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11551"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rationalemagazine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11549"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rationalemagazine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11549"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rationalemagazine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11549"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rationalemagazine.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=11549"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}